Selamat malam kawan. Anda penggemar serial game Call of duty? Kalo iya, berarti kita sama. Saya selalu mengikuti dan mengoleksi seluruh seri game Call Of duty. Tapi ketika seri game terakhir Call of duty rilis, yakni seri Advanced warfare. Saya tidak bisa memainkannya, karena spesifikasi minimum tidak sampai pada perangkat komputer saya. Dengan grafis yang tinggi, maka spesifikasi perangkat komputer harus juga mempunyai spesifikasi yang harus dipenuhi dengan spesifikasi minimumnya.

Jangan sedih, dengan permintaan RAM sebanyak 6 GB anda bisa memainkannya dengan RAM 4GB, tapi bukan hanya RAM nya saja VGA juga tentu harus ada yang memenuhi hehe 😀 Tapi malam ini saya akan memberikan Crack Fix COD AW untuk RAM 4GB, dimana anda bisa memainkan game COD AW di RAM 4GB. Xlstat Crack Serial Keygen Kaspersky Internet. Silahkan sedot!!!

This year's installment to the Call of Duty franchise, Black Ops III, has just hit stores, and is predictably flying off shelves. As with every ceremonial annual release, Black Ops III raises the visual presentation standards for the franchise. There is, however, one hitch with the way the game deals with system memory amounts as high as 12 GB and video memory amounts as high as 8 GB. This hitch could possibly be the reason behind the stuttering issues many users are reporting. In our first play-through of the game with its highest possible settings on our personal gaming machines - equipped with a 2560 x 1600 pixels display, Core i7 'Haswell' quad-core CPU, 12 GB of RAM, a GeForce GTX 980 Ti graphics card, NVIDIA's latest Black Ops III Game Ready driver 385.87, and Windows 7 64-bit to top it all off, we noticed that the game was running out of memory. Taking a peek at Task Manager revealed that in 'Ultra' settings (and 2560 x 1600 resolution), the game was maxing out memory usage within our 12 GB, not counting the 1.5-2 GB used up by the OS and essential lightweight tasks (such as antivirus). TheDeeGee said: Didn't know the CoD Series was still a thing.

GTX 960 to play Black ops 3 at 8 gb ram? Play battlefield 3 and call of duty black ops with. 1 1080p ultra settings with i5 4570 + 1050ti 4gb + 8gb DDR3 Ram?

Its not really, its just a money grab at this point. Definitely not even thinking about picking this game up, especially after seeing this crap lol.

Certainly not upgrading anything in my system to play a new call of duty game. The originals were amazing games. But like I said, its just a money grab now.

I would like to see a remake of a WW2 game, only problem is they will never make another call of duty with the COD2 layout. I WANT a custom server browser. Not some lame matchmaking non-sense. GhostRyder said: Are you serious??? There is no way they need that much Vram to run that game realistically for that game. Agreed, this is just absurd.

Posted on Nov 5th 2015, 17:43. One thing is pushing the limits and another just being lazy. Craming gazillion textures and polygons in engine and requiring super computer is just moronic.

It just means they put ZERO effort in designing the engine, they just crammed everything into it. That's why Unreal Engine 4 runs on pretty much anything no matter what even with most likely same fidelity as this CoD.

Because if those are the specs, not many people can actually run that. I mean, I have 32GB RAM so I don't care, but graphic card is still 'just' 4GB (GTX 980). If you want to target the broadest target public, you can't have specs like this.

Or it has to look like nothing we've seen to date. Frankly, I doubt that will be the case. Posted on Nov 5th 2015, 17:50. RejZoR said: But in all honesty, while Crysis is still super demanding, it looked spectacular at time and is in a way still a benchmark for visual fidelity.

Mostly because it's SO old but looks like it was released a year or two ago. Use a custom cfg and an HD texture pak and it looks absolutely (even more) epic! Crysis was one of those games that will go down in history for everything that it meant in terms of pushing visual fidelity.

The game aged pretty well still looks awesome even for today's standards. Posted on Nov 5th 2015, 18:02. GreiverBlade said: well wasn't COD:Ghost RAM hungry (for the standard at the time) around 6gb needed or it wouldn't run? That one put the challenge a bit higher tho (ABOUT TWICE HIGHER????

6gb is not enough. Hello 8gb 390/x/290/x. Well i have a 980 4gb but i am not interested in COD games anymore (although Ghost was fun when i played it ) So basically we are stuck with about 5 video cards with enough video memory to run this game at ultra. Posted on Nov 5th 2015, 18:24.

Yup Call of Dooty. And I do mean Dooty. I really wish they would just go back to keeping it simple like with CoD4.

It almost seems like they are the Apple of video games. They add all these 'features' that other games have used and executed better in previous titles but once CoD does it, it is all ohhhhhh mmerrrr gawwwddd melting my face. They are just very lazy. Console kiddies will gobble this up as always as that's the bigger market. This series just needs to go away for awhile to give itself time to reinvent. They are just snagging and grabbing from other titles now. Posted on Nov 5th 2015, 18:33.

GhostRyder said: So basically we are stuck with about 5 video cards with enough video memory to run this game at ultra. Kiddagoat said: Yup Call of Dooty. And I do mean Dooty. I really wish they would just go back to keeping it simple like with CoD4.

It almost seems like they are the Apple of video games. They add all these 'features' that other games have used and executed better in previous titles but once CoD does it, it is all ohhhhhh mmerrrr gawwwddd melting my face. They are just very lazy. Console kiddies will gobble this up as always as that's the bigger market. This series just needs to go away for awhile to give itself time to reinvent.

They are just snagging and grabbing from other titles now. I foresee this affecting the sales of this game big time.(PC Sales) -consoles always do well with the kidz) I mean its already a money grab series, most people who enjoyed the original ones, are not buying the new ones because of how stupid the gameplay now is. Also too, I am pretty sure that most people who want this game will be younger kids who want to play another Call Of Duty run n gun spray n pray game All these perks/attachments/killing streaks are just lame, you don't need any actual skill to get first place, its basically who can out cheese the other player, this is the main reason I stopped playing.

The original games actually took teamwork/skill If only, they would just make a simplistic barebones shooter like the originals with a custom server browser. I would buy it in a heartbeat. Posted on Nov 5th 2015, 18:34. W1zzard said: or have 16 GB RAM, which makes GTX 980 Ti work flawlessly I thought I read it stutters on the GTX 980ti but that disappears with the Titan X? Oh I missed that bottom comment about 16gb of ram and the GTX 980ti working fine. Ok so we now have 6 Cards that can run it efficiently on Ultra.

Jborg said: I foresee this affecting the sales of this game big time. I mean its already a money grab series, most people who enjoyed the original ones, are not buying the new ones because of how stupid the gameplay now is. Also too, I am pretty sure that most people who want this game will be younger kids who want to play another Call Of Duty run n gun spray n pray game All these perks/attachments/killing streaks are just lame, you don't need any actual skill to get first place, its basically who can out cheese the other player, this is the main reason I stopped playing. The original games actually took teamwork/skill If only, they would just make a simplistic barebones shooter like the originals with a custom server browser.

I would buy it in a heartbeat. Eh yea, I actually like the Black Ops/WaW games just for the zombies personally as the multiplayer got to boring and pretty easy if you know the right ways to play it (Meaning right guns, positions, etc). Posted on Nov 5th 2015, 18:35 1 to 25 of 168 Go to Page.